Libel

Libel Defamation Tort Law Slander Legal
Libel is a tort consisting of a false, malicious, unprivileged publication that aims to defame a living person or to mar the memory of one deceased. Printed or written material, signs, or pictures that tend to expose a person to public scorn, hatred, contempt, or ridicule may be considered libelous.
On this page

What is Libel?

Libel is a form of defamation expressed in a permanent medium, particularly in writing, print, or some other tangible form. It is a false and defamatory statement made about someone, published without lawful justification, which injures the reputation of that person. Unlike slander, which refers to spoken defamation, libel involves damage done by printed words, photographs, signs, or other visual content.

Examples of Libel

  1. Newspaper Articles: Publishing a false story about someone committing a crime that they did not commit.
  2. Social Media Posts: Posting an untrue statement on Facebook alleging that a person has a contagious disease.
  3. Books or Magazines: An author including false and damaging claims about someone in their book.
  4. Public Billboards: Displaying a defamatory statement about a person in a public place.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

1. What is the difference between libel and slander? Libel refers to defamatory statements made in writing or another permanent form, whereas slander involves defamatory remarks that are spoken or otherwise temporary.

2. Can a true statement ever be considered libelous? No, for a statement to be considered libel, it must be false. Truth is a defense to defamation.

3. What defenses are available to someone accused of libel? Common defenses include truth, privilege (absolute or qualified), opinion (if the statement is clearly an opinion rather than a fact), and consent.

4. Can public figures sue for libel? Yes, public figures can sue for libel, but they must also prove actual malice, meaning the statement was made with knowledge of its falsity or with reckless disregard for the truth.

5. Is an apology sufficient to mitigate a libel claim? An apology can sometimes mitigate damages but does not automatically absolve the publisher of liability.

  • Slander: Defamation that is spoken and not captured in a permanent form.
  • Defamation: A general term encompassing both libel and slander, referring to the act of damaging someone’s reputation.
  • Actual Malice: Knowing that a statement is false or recklessly disregarding whether it is false, a standard required in libel cases involving public figures.
  • Privilege: A defense in defamation cases where some communications are of social importance and are thus protected, such as in judicial proceedings.

Online Resources

  1. Legal Information Institute - Defamation
  2. American Bar Association - Defamation, Libel, and Slander
  3. FindLaw - Libel and Slander Law

Suggested Books for Further Studies

  1. The Law of Defamation and the Internet by Matthew Collins
  2. American Defamation Law by Robert D. Sack
  3. Gatley on Libel and Slander by Patrick Milmo QC and W. V. H. Rogers
  4. Defamation, Libel Tourism and the SPEECH Act of 2010 by Jeffrey W. Stempel and Willaim P. Bryson
  5. McNae’s Essential Law for Journalists by Mike Dodd and Mark Hanna
### What is required for a statement to be considered libelous? - [x] The statement must be false and defamatory. - [ ] The statement must be true and defamatory. - [ ] The statement must be anonymous. - [ ] The statement must be an opinion. > **Explanation:** For a statement to be considered libelous, it must be false and defamatory. Truthful statements cannot be libelous, and opinions are typically protected. ### Which form of defamation is captured in a permanent medium? - [x] Libel - [ ] Slander - [ ] Both Libel and Slander - [ ] Neither Libel nor Slander > **Explanation:** Libel refers to defamation in a permanent form such as writing or prints, while slander involves spoken or temporary statements. ### Can a public figure sue for libel? - [x] Yes, with proof of actual malice. - [ ] Yes, with proof of negligence. - [ ] No, public figures cannot sue for libel. - [ ] Only under specific statutory provisions. > **Explanation:** Public figures can sue for libel, but they must demonstrate actual malice, meaning the defamatory statement was made knowingly false or with reckless disregard for its truth. ### What is a common defense to a libel claim? - [x] Truth - [ ] Ignorance - [ ] Affection - [ ] Innuendo > **Explanation:** Truth is a common and absolute defense to a libel claim. If a statement is true, it cannot be defamatory. ### What differentiates libel from slander? - [x] The form in which the defamatory statement is made. - [ ] The severity of the allegation. - [ ] The nationality of the parties involved. - [ ] The visibility of the statement. > **Explanation:** Libel is defamation in a permanent form such as writing or pictures, whereas slander is spoken or otherwise temporary. ### What must be proven in libel cases involving public figures that is not typically required in cases involving private individuals? - [x] Actual malice - [ ] Intentional harm - [ ] Direct harm - [ ] Proximate cause > **Explanation:** Public figures must prove actual malice, demonstrating that the defamatory statements were made with knowledge of falsity or with reckless disregard for the truth. ### Can an apology fully absolve a person of a libel claim? - [ ] Yes, an apology fully absolves liability. - [x] No, it can mitigate damages but does not automatically absolve liability. - [ ] Yes, only if accepted by the defamed party. - [ ] No, it has no effect on the lawsuit. > **Explanation:** An apology may help reduce the damages but does not completely absolve the person from a libel claim. ### Which term refers to privileged communications intended to protect some forms of speech despite their defamatory content? - [ ] Perjury - [x] Privilege - [ ] Immunity - [ ] Permission > **Explanation:** Privilege refers to communications protected by law, even if they contain defamatory content, to encourage free and open discourse in certain contexts such as judicial proceedings. ### What type of statement is typically not actionable as libel? - [x] Opinion clearly labeled as such. - [ ] False factual statement. - [ ] Statements alleging criminal conduct. - [ ] Accusations of moral failings. > **Explanation:** Opinions that are clearly labeled as such are generally protected and not actionable as libel. Only false factual statements are considered defamatory. ### What does 'actual malice' involve? - [x] Knowledge of the falsity or reckless disregard for the truth. - [ ] Negligence in verifying information. - [ ] Intent to harm the reputation. - [ ] Intent to make profit. > **Explanation:** Actual malice involves knowledge that the defamatory statement is false or a reckless disregard for whether it is true, required for public figure cases.

Thank you for exploring the concept of libel and testing your understanding through our quiz. Continue your studies to master the intricacies of defamation law!

Wednesday, August 7, 2024
LIBID: London Inter Bank Bid Rate
Liar Loan
Personal Injury January 1, 1
Slander January 1, 1

Accounting Terms Lexicon

Discover comprehensive accounting definitions and practical insights. Empowering students and professionals with clear and concise explanations for a better understanding of financial terms.